Iterate to Differentiate: Enhancing Discriminability and Reliability in Zero-Shot TTS Evaluation

Abstract

Reliable evaluation of modern zero-shot text-to-speech(TTS) models remains challenging. Subjective tests are costly and hard to reproduce, while objective metrics often saturate, failing to distinguish SOTA systems. To address this, we propose Iterate to Differentiate (I2D), an evaluation framework that recursively synthesizes speech using the model's own outputs as references. Higher-quality models exhibit greater resilienceto the distributional shift induced by iterative synthesis, resulting in slower performance degradation. I2D exploits this differential degradation to amplify performance gaps and reveal robustness. By aggregating objective metrics across iterations, I2D improves discriminability and alignment with human judgments, increasing system-level SRCC from 0.118 to 0.464 for UTMOSv2. Experiments on 11 models across Chinese, English, and emotion datasets demonstrate that I2D enables more reliable automated evaluation for zero-shot TTS.

The overall workflow of our evaluation.

Benchmark Results

Objective metrics aggregated across 10 iterations (Mean Score) and human evaluation at iterations 1 and 10.

Model SIM ↑ CER ↓ UTMOSv2 ↑ Content Acc. ↑ Spk. Consistency ↑ Naturalness ↑
Iter 1Iter 10 Iter 1Iter 10 Iter 1Iter 10
Model SIM ↑ WER ↓ UTMOSv2 ↑
Model Angry F1 ↑ Happy F1 ↑ Sad F1 ↑ Weighted Avg ↑

Detail Results

Per-iteration metric trends across models. Each line shows how a model's performance changes over 10 recursive synthesis iterations.

Audio Demos

Compare synthesis quality across models and iterations. Reference audio is shown for comparison.